I could not
find a definition of style in the Hill text, but after reviewing the material,
it seems that this author believes that style is writing “freely, clearly, and
forcibly.” The author has a deep respect
for the conventions of writing, yet sees the writer as a being who should
freely express oneself. The Brooks text classified style as either being dry,
plain, neat, elegant, florid, or bombastic.
Regardless of the style, the entire purpose of it is to make sure that
it conveys the meaning that the writer intended. The one thing that I noticed is
that when discussing style, the author mentioned a lot of things that writers
should avoid.
The DKHB
text seems to believe that style should be developed with the audience in mind. The reader should be considered in writing
and the writer should carefully choose the words, sentences, and paragraphs
that can help the writer to become most persuasive. It has a more modern feel to it and it doesn’t
go overboard in what students should avoid.
It sounds as though you are skeptical that style should be developed with audience in mind.... ;)
ReplyDelete